The drop is always movingYou know that saying about standing on the shoulders of giants? Drupal is standing on a huge pile of midgetsAll content management systems suck, Drupal just happens to suck less.Popular open source software is more secure than unpopular open source software, because insecure software becomes unpopular fast. [That doesn't happen for proprietary software.]Drupal makes sandwiches happen.There is a module for that

Drupal 8 progress from my / MongoDB perspective: update #11

Submitted by nk on Mon, 2013-01-07 20:10

Most importantly: we added static caching to the configuration management system. This paves the way of further speedup by utilizing cache_get_multiple instead of loading each object one by one. While Drupal always had the capability to override certain variables in settings.php this is now much nicer and even has its own little API, settings()->get(). The separation of these settings necessary for bootstrap versus the CMI overrides was badly needed. Also, the new Entity Query system now has relationship support (that has been a frequent request). The last piece to the Entity Query puzzle before making it the default Views query plugin is the aggregation support, which now can commence -- it entirely relied on the revamped codebase of the relationship patch so it couldn't get further.

Meanwhile, others have been busy too and blocks are now plugins. This adds a real lot of flexibility. Most importantly, it's possible to place a block multiple times and now blocks use CMI. Custom blocks are now a separate module and soon will be entities. While there is a mongodb_block / mongodb_block_ui module for Drupal 7 it does not integrate with the system at all, it's basically a copy of the whole block module with small pieces replaced with MongoDB queries. That's ... not effective maintenance-wise to say the least.

Of course, there were many bugs fixed, I am very grateful for being able to spend the necessary time on some really gnarly, extremely hard to pin down bugs -- one issue have seen no less than 51 patch submissions over just a few days.

Commenting on this Story is closed.

Submitted by Anonymous on Mon, 2013-01-07 20:27.

So now we can find taxonomy terms parents using EFQ?

Submitted by nk on Mon, 2013-01-07 20:59.

Still no. Taxonomy hiearchy is not part of the entity system.